Expositions of Holy Scripture.
by Alexander Maclaren.
WHAT "THE GOSPEL" IS
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ.--Mark i. 1
My purpose now is to point out some of the various connections in which the New Testament uses that familiar phrase, "the gospel," and briefly to gather some of the important thoughts which these suggest.
Possibly the process may help to restore freshness to a word so well worn that it slips over our tongues almost unnoticed and excites little thought.
The history of the word in the New Testament books is worth notice. It seldom occurs in those lives of our Lord which now are emphatically so called, and where it does occur, it is "the gospel of the Kingdom"
quite as frequently as "the gospel" of the King. The word is never used in Luke, and only twice in the Acts of the Apostles, both times in quotations. The Apostle John never employs it, either in his "gospel" or in his epistles, and in the Apocalypse the word is only once found, and then it may be a question whether it refers to the good news of salvation in Jesus Christ. John thought of the word which he had to proclaim as "the message," "the witness," "the truth,"
rather than as "the gospel." We search for the expression in vain in the epistles of James, Jude, and to the Hebrews. Thrice it is used by Peter. The great bulk of the instances of its occurrence are in the writings of Paul, who, if not the first to use it, at any rate is the source from which the familiar meaning of the phrase, as describing the sum total of the revelation in Jesus Christ, has flowed.
The various connections in which the word is employed are remarkable and instructive. We can but touch lightly on the more important lessons which they are fitted to teach.
I. The Gospel is the "Gospel of Christ."
On our Lord"s own lips and in the records of His life we find, as has already been noticed, the phrase, "the gospel of the kingdom"--the good news of the establishment on earth of the rule of G.o.d in the hearts and lives of men. The person of the King is not yet defined by it. The diffused dawn floods the sky, and upon them that sit in darkness the greatness of its light shines, before the sun is above the horizon. The message of the Forerunner proclaimed, like a herald"s clarion, the coming of the Kingdom, before he could say to a more receptive few, "Behold the Lamb of G.o.d." The order is first the message of the Kingdom, then the discovery of the King. And so that earlier phrase falls out of use, and when once Christ"s life had been lived, and His death died, the gospel is no longer the message of an impersonal revolution in the world"s att.i.tude to G.o.d"s will, but the biography of Him who is at once first subject and monarch of the Kingdom of Heaven, and by whom alone we are brought into it. The standing expression comes to be "the gospel of Christ."
It is His, not so much because He is the author, as because He is the subject of it. It is the good news about Christ. He is its contents and great theme. And so we are led up at once to the great central peculiarity of Christianity, namely that it is a record of historical fact, and that all the world"s life and blessedness lie in the story of a human life and death. Christ is Christianity. His biography is the good news for every child of man.
Neither a philosophy nor a morality, but a history, is the true good news for men. The world is hungry, and when it cries for bread wise men give it a stone, but G.o.d gives it the fare it needs in the bread that comes down from Heaven. Though it be of small account in many people"s eyes, like the common barley cakes, the poor man"s food, it is what we all need; and humble people, and simple people, and uneducated people, and barbarous people, and dying people, and the little children can all eat and live. They would find little to keep them from starving in anything more ambitious, and would only break their teeth in mumbling the dry bones of philosophies and moralities.
But the story of their Brother who has lived and died for them feeds heart and mind and will, fancy and imagination, memory and hope, nourishes the whole nature into health and beauty, and alone deserves to be called good news for men.
All that the world needs lies in that story. Out of it have come peace and gladness to the soul, light for the understanding, cleansing for the conscience, renovation for the will, which can be made strong and free by submission, a resting-place for the heart, and a starting-point and a goal for the loftiest flights of hope. Out of it have come the purifying of family and civic life, the culture of all n.o.ble social virtues, the sanct.i.ty of the household, and the elevation of the state. The thinker has found the largest problems raised and solved therein. The setting forth of a loftier morality, and the enthusiasm which makes the foulest nature aspire to and reach its heaven-touching heights, are found together there. To it poet and painter, architect and musician, owe their n.o.blest themes. The good news of the world is the story of Christ"s life and death. Let us be thankful for its form; let us be thankful for its substance.
But we must not forget that, as Paul, who is so fond of the word, has taught us, the historical fact needs some explanation and commentary to make the history a gospel. He has declared to us "the gospel which he preached," and to which he ascribes saving power, and he gives these as its elements, "How that Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day, according to the Scriptures." There are three facts--death, burial, resurrection. These are the things that any eye could have seen. Are these the gospel? Is there any saving power in them? Not unless you add the commentary "for our sins," and "according to the Scriptures." That death was a death for us all, by which we are delivered from our sins--that is the main thing; and in subordination to that thought, the other that Christ"s death was the accomplishment of prophecies--these make the history a gospel. The bare facts, without the exhibition of their purpose and meaning, are no more a gospel than any other story of a death would be. The facts with any lower explanation of their meaning are no gospel, any more than the story of the death of Socrates or any innocent martyr would be. If you would know the good news that will lift your heavy heart from sorrow and break your chains of sin, that will put music into your life and make your days blaze into brightness as when the sunlight strikes some sullen mountain-side that lay black in shadow, you must take the fact with its meaning, and find your gospel in the life and death of Him who is more than example and more than martyr. "How that Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures," is "the gospel of Christ."
II. The Gospel of Christ is the "Gospel of G.o.d."
This form of the expression, though by no means so frequent as the other, is found throughout Paul"s epistles, thrice in the earliest--Thessalonians (1 Thess. ii. 8), once in the great Epistle to the Romans (i. 1), once in Corinthians (2 Cor. xi. 7), and once in a modified form in the pathetic letter from the dungeon, which the old man addressed to his "son Timothy" (1 Tim. i. 11). It is also found in the writings of Peter (1 Pet. iv. 17). In all these cases the phrase, "the gospel of G.o.d," may mean the gospel which has G.o.d for its author or origin, but it seems rather to mean "which has G.o.d for its subject."
It was, as we saw, mainly designated as the good news about Jesus Christ, but it is also the good news about G.o.d. So in one and the same set of facts we have the history of Jesus and the revelation of G.o.d.
They are not only the biography of a man, but they are the unveiling of the heart of G.o.d. These Scripture writers take it for granted that their readers will understand that paradox, and do not stop to explain how they change the statement of the subject matter of their message, in this extraordinary fashion, between their Master who had lived and died on earth, and the Unseen Almightiness throned above all heavens.
How comes that to be?
It is not that the gospel has two subjects, one of which is the matter of one portion, and the other of another. It does not sometimes speak of Christ, and sometimes rise to tell us of G.o.d. It is always speaking of both, and when its subject is most exclusively the man Christ Jesus, it is then most chiefly the Father G.o.d. How comes that to be?
Surely this unconscious shifting of the statement of their theme, which these writers practise as a matter of course, shows us how deeply the conviction had stamped itself on their spirits, "He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father," and how the point of view from which they had learned to look on all the sweet and wondrous story of their Master"s life and death, was that of a revelation of the deepest heart of G.o.d.
And so must we look on that whole career, from the cradle to the cross, from Calvary to Olivet, if we are to know its deepest tenderness and catch its gladdest notes. That such a man has lived and died is beautiful, and the portrait will hang for ever as that of the fairest of the children of men. But that in that life and death we have our most authentic knowledge of what G.o.d is, and that all the pity and truth, the gentleness and the brotherliness, the tears and the self-surrender, are a revelation to us of G.o.d; and that the cross, with its awful sorrow and its painful death, tells us not only how a man gave himself for those whom he loved, but how G.o.d loves the world and how tremendous is His law--this is good news of G.o.d indeed. We have to look for our truest knowledge of Him not in the majesties of the starry heavens, nor in the depths of our own souls, not in the scattered tokens of His character given by the perplexed order of the world, nor in the intuitions of the wise, but in the life and death of His Son, whose tears are the pity of G.o.d as well as the compa.s.sion of a man, and in whose life and death the whole world may behold "the brightness of His glory and the express image of His person," and be delivered from all their fears of an angry, and all their doubts of an unknown, G.o.d.
There is a double modification of this phrase. We hear of "the gospel of the grace of G.o.d" and "the gospel of the glory of G.o.d," which latter expression, rendered in the English version misleadingly "the glorious gospel," is given in its true shape in the Revised Version.
The great theme of the message is further defined in these two noteworthy forms. It is the tender love of G.o.d in exercise to lowly creatures who deserve something else that the gospel is busy in setting forth, a love which flows forth unbought and unmotived save by itself, like some stream from a hidden lake high up among the pure Alpine snows. The story of Christ"s work is the story of G.o.d"s rich, unmerited love, bending down to creatures far beneath, and making a radiant pathway from earth to heaven, like the sevenfold rainbow. It is so, not merely because this mission is the result of G.o.d"s love, but also because His grace is G.o.d"s grace, and therefore every act of Christ which speaks His own tenderness is therein an apocalypse of G.o.d.
The second of these two expressions, "the gospel of the glory of G.o.d,"
leads up to that great thought that the true glory of the divine nature is its tenderness. The lowliness and death of Christ are the glory of G.o.d! Not in the awful attributes which separate that inconceivable Nature from us, not in the eternity of His existence, nor in the Infinitude of His Being, not in the Omnipotence of His unwearied arm, nor in fire-eyed Omniscience, but in the pity and graciousness which bend lovingly over us, is the true glory of G.o.d.
These pompous "attributes" are but the fringes of the brightness, the living white heart of which is love. G.o.d"s glory is G.o.d"s grace, and the purest expression of both is found there, where Jesus hangs dying in the dark, The true throne of G.o.d"s glory is not builded high in a remote heaven, flashing intolerable brightness and set about with bending princ.i.p.alities and powers, but it is the Cross of Calvary. The story of the "grace of our Lord Jesus Christ," with its humiliation and shame, is the "gospel of the grace," and therefore is the "gospel of the glory, of G.o.d."
III. The good news of Christ and of G.o.d is the gospel of our salvation and peace.
We read of "the gospel of your salvation" (Eph. i. 13), and in the same letter (vi. 15) of "the gospel of peace." In these expressions we pa.s.s from the consideration of the author or of the subject matter of the good news to that of its purpose and issue. It is meant to bring to men, and it does in fact bring to all who accept it, those wide and complex blessings described by those two great words.
That good news about Christ and G.o.d brings to a man salvation, if he believes it. To know and feel that I have a loving Father who has so cared for me and all my brethren that He has sent His Son to live and die for me, is surely enough to deliver me from all the bonds and death of sin, and to quicken me into humble consecration to His service. And such emanc.i.p.ation from the burden and misery of sin, from the gnawing consciousness of evil and the weakening sense of guilt, from the dominion of wrong tastes and habits, and from the despair of ever shaking them off which is only too well grounded in the experience of the past, is the beginning of salvation for each of us.
That great keyword of the New Testament covers the whole field of positive and negative good which man can need or G.o.d can give.
Negatively it includes the removal of every evil, whether of the nature of sorrow or of sin, under which men can groan. Positively it includes the endowment with all good, whether of the nature of joy or of purity, which men can hope for or receive. It is past, present, and future, for every heart that accepts "the word of the truth of the gospel"--past, inasmuch as the first effect of even the most incomplete acceptance is to put us in a new position and att.i.tude towards the law of G.o.d, and to plant the germs of all holiness and joy in our souls; present, inasmuch as salvation is a growing possession and a continuous process running on all through our lives, if we be true to ourselves and our calling; future, inasmuch as its completion waits to be unveiled in another order of things, where perfect purity and perfect consecration shall issue in perfect joy. And all this enn.o.bling and enriching of human nature is produced by that good news about the grace and glory of G.o.d and of Christ, if we will only listen to it, and let it work its work on our souls.
Substantially the same set of facts is included under that other expression, "the gospel of peace." The Hebrew use of the word "peace"
as a kind of shorthand for all good is probably to be remembered. But even in the narrower sense of the word, how great are the blessings set forth by it! All inward serenity and outward calm, the tranquillity of a soul free from the agitations of emotion and the storms of pa.s.sions and the tumults of desire, as well as the security of a life guarded from the a.s.saults of foes and girded about with an impregnable barrier which nothing can destroy and no enemy overleap, are ours, if we take the good news about G.o.d to our heart. They are ours in the measure in which we take it. Clearly such truths as those which the gospel brings have a plain tendency to give peace. They give peace with G.o.d, with the world, and with ourselves. They lead to trust, and trust is peace. They lead to union with G.o.d, and that is peace. They lead to submission, and that is peace. They lead to consecration, and that is peace. They lead to indifference to fleeting joys and treasures, and that is peace. They give to heart and mind and will an all-sufficient and infinite object, and that is peace. They deliver us from ourselves, and that is peace. They fill the past, the present, and the future with the loving Father"s presence, and brighten life and death with the Saviour"s footsteps--and so to live is calm, and to die is to lay ourselves down in peace and sleep, quiet by His side, like a child by its mother. The good news about G.o.d and Christ is the good news of our salvation and of our peace.
IV. The good news about Christ and G.o.d is _the_ gospel.
By far the most frequent form in which the word gospel occurs is that of the simple use of the noun with the definite article. This message is emphatically _the_ good news. It is the tidings which men most of all want. It stands alone; there is no other like it. If this be not the glad tidings of great joy for the world, then there are none.
Let no false liberality lead us to lose sight of the exclusive claims which are made in this phrase for the set of facts the narrative of which const.i.tutes "the gospel." The life and death of Jesus Christ for the sins of the world, His resurrection and continuous life for the saving of the world--these are the truths, without which there can be no gospel. They may be apprehended in different ways, set forth in different perspective, proclaimed in different dialects, explained in different fashion, a.s.sociated with different accompaniments, drawn out into different consequences, and yet, through all diversity of tones, the message may be one. Sounded on a ram"s horn or a silver trumpet, it may be the same saving and joy-bringing proclamation, and it will be, if Christ and His life and death are plainly set forth as the beginning and ending of all. But if there be an omission of that mighty name, or if a Christ be proclaimed without a Cross, a salvation without a Saviour, or a Saviour without a Sacrifice, all the adornments of genius and sincerity will not prevent such a half gospel from falling flat. Its preachers have never been able, and never will be able, to touch the general heart or to bring good cheer to men.
They have always had to complain, "We have piped unto you and ye have not danced." They cannot get people to be glad over such a message.
Only when you speak of a Christ who has died for our sins, will you cause the heavy heart of the world to sing for joy. Only that old, old message is the good news which men want.
There is no second gospel. Men who preach a message of a different kind, as Paul tells us, are preaching what is not really another gospel. There cannot be two messages. There is but one genuine; all others are counterfeits. For us it is all-important that we should be no less narrow than the truth, and no more liberal than he was to whom the message "how that Jesus died for our sins" was the only thing worth calling the gospel. Our own salvation depends on our firm grasp of that one message, and for some of us, the clear decisiveness with which our lips ring it out determines whether we shall be blessings or curses to our generation. There is a Babel of voices now preaching other messages which promise good tidings of good. Let us cleave with all our hearts to Christ alone, and let our tongues not falter in proclaiming, "Neither is there salvation in any other." The gospel of the Christ who died for our sins, is _the_ gospel.
And what we have for ourselves to do with it is told us in that pregnant phrase of the apostle"s, "my gospel," and "our gospel"; meaning not merely the message which he was charged to proclaim, but the good news which he and his brethren had made their own. So we have to make it ours. It is of no use to us, unless we do. It is not enough that it echoes all around us, like music borne upon the wind. It is not enough that we hear it, as men do some sweet melody, while their thoughts are busy on other things. It is not enough that we believe it, as we do other histories in which we have no concern. What more is needed? Another expression of the apostle"s gives the answer. He speaks of "the faith of the gospel," that is the trust which that glad message evokes, and by which it is laid hold of.
Make it yours by trusting your whole self to the Christ of whom it tells you. The reliance of heart and will on Jesus who has died for me, makes it "my gospel." There is one G.o.d, one Christ, one gospel which tells us of them, and one faith by which we lay hold upon the gospel, and upon the loving Father and the ever-helpful Saviour of whom it tells. Let us make that great word our own by simple faith, and then "as cold water to our thirsty soul," so will be that "good news from a far country," the country where the Father"s house is, and to which He has sent the Elder Brother to bring back us prodigal children.
THE STRONG FORERUNNER AND THE STRONGER SON
"The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of G.o.d; 2. As it is written in the prophets, Behold, I send My messenger before Thy face, which shall prepare Thy way before Thee. 3. The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make His paths straight. 4. John did baptize in the wilderness, and preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. 5. And there went out unto him all the land of Judaea, and they of Jerusalem, and were all baptized of him in the river of Jordan, confessing their sins. 6. And John was clothed with camel"s hair, and with a girdle of a skin about his loins; and he did eat locusts and wild honey; 7. And preached, saying, There cometh One mightier than I after me, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to stoop down and unloose. 8. I indeed have baptized you with water: but He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost. 9. And it came to pa.s.s in those days, that Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee, and was baptized of John in Jordan. And straightway coming up out of the water, He saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon Him: 11. And there came a voice from heaven, saying, Thou art My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased."--Mark i. 1-11.
The first words of _In Memoriam_ might be taken to describe the theme of Mark"s Gospel. It is the "strong Son of G.o.d" whom he sets forth in his rapid, impetuous narrative, which is full of fiery energy, and delights to paint the unresting continuity of Christ"s filial service.
His theme is not the King, as in Matthew; nor the Son of Man, as in Luke; nor the eternal Word manifested in flesh, as in John. Therefore he neither begins by tracing His kingly lineage, as does the first evangelist; nor by dwelling on the humanities of wedded life and the sacredness of the family since He has been born; nor by soaring to the abysses of the eternal abiding of the Word with G.o.d, as the agent of creation, the medium of life and light; but plunges at once into his subject, and begins the Gospel with the mission of the Forerunner, which melts immediately into the appearance of the Son.
I. We may note first, in this pa.s.sage, the prelude, including verses 1, 2, and 3. We need not discuss the grammatical connection of these verses, nor the relation of verses 2 and 3 to the following section.
However that be settled, the result, for our present purpose, is the same. Mark considers that John"s mission is the beginning of the gospel. Here are two noteworthy points,--his use of that well-worn word, "the gospel," and his view of John"s place in relation to it.
The gospel is the narrative of the facts of Christ"s life and death.
Later usage has taken it to be, rather, the statement of the truths deducible from these facts, and especially the proclamation of salvation by the power of Christ"s atoning death; but the primitive application of the word is to the history itself. So Paul uses it in his formal statement of the gospel which he preached, with the addition, indeed, of the explanation of the meaning of Christ"s death (1 Cor. xv. 1-6). The very name "good news" necessarily implies that the gospel is, primarily, history; but we cannot exclude from the meaning of the word the statement of the significance of the facts, without which the facts have no message of blessing. Mark adds the dogmatic element when he defines the subject of the Gospel as being "Jesus Christ, the Son of G.o.d." In the remainder of the book the simple name "Jesus" is used; but here, in starting, the full, solemn t.i.tle is given, which unites the contemplation of Him in His manhood, in His office as fulfiller of prophecy and crown of revelation, and in His mysterious, divine nature.
Whether we regard verses 2 and 3 as connected grammatically with the preceding or the following verses, they equally refer to John, and define his position in relation to the Gospel. The Revised Version restores the true reading, "in Isaiah the prophet," which some unwise and timid transcriber has, as he thought, mended into "the prophets,"
for fear that an error should be found in Scripture. Of course, verse 2 is not Isaiah"s, but Malachi"s; but verse 3, which is Isaiah"s, was uppermost in Mark"s mind, and his quotation of Malachi is, apparently, an afterthought, and is plainly merely introductory of the other, on which the stress lies. The remarkable variation in the Malachi quotation, which occurs in all three Evangelists, shows how completely they recognised the divinity of our Lord, in their making words which, in the original, are addressed by Jehovah to Himself, to be addressed by the Father to the Son. There is a difference in the representation of the office of the forerunner in the two prophetic pa.s.sages. In the former "he" prepares the way of the coming Lord; in the latter he calls upon his hearers to prepare it. In fact, John prepared the way, as we shall see presently, just by calling on men to do so. In Mark"s view, the first stage in the gospel is the mission of John. He might have gone further back--to the work of prophets of old, or to the earliest beginnings in time of the self-revelation of G.o.d, as the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews does; or he might have ascended even higher up the stream--to the true "beginning," from which the fourth Evangelist starts. But his distinctly practical genius leads him to fix his gaze on the historical fact of John"s mission, and to claim for it a unique position, which he proceeds to develop.
II. So we have, next, the strong servant and fore runner (verses 4-8).
The abruptness with which the curtain is drawn, and the gaunt figure of the desert-loving ascetic shown us, is very striking. It is like the way in which Elijah, his prototype, leaps, as it were, full-armed, into the arena. The parallel pa.s.sage in Matthew links his appearance with the events which it has been narrating by the phrase "in these days," and calls him "the Baptist." Mark has no such words, but lets him stand forth in his isolation. The two accounts may profitably be compared. Their likenesses suggest that they rest on a common basis, probably of oral tradition, while their differences are, for the most part, significant. Mark differs in his arrangement of the common matter, in omissions, and in some variations of expression. Each account gives a general summary of John"s teaching at the beginning; but Matthew puts emphasis on the Baptist"s proclamation that the kingdom of heaven was at hand, to which nothing in Mark corresponds.
His Gospel does not dwell on the royalty of Jesus, but rather represents Him as the Servant than as the King. Mark begins with describing John as baptizing, which only appears later in Matthew"s account. Mark omits all reference to the Sadducees and Pharisees, and to John"s sharp words to them. He has nothing about the axe laid to the trees, nothing about the children of Abraham, nothing about the fan in the hand of the great Husbandman. All the theocratic aspect of the Messiah, as proclaimed by John, is absent; and, as there is no reference to the fire which destroys, so neither is there to the fire of the Holy Ghost, in which He baptizes. Mark reports only John"s preaching and baptism of repentance, and his testimony to Christ as stronger than he, and as baptizing with the Holy Ghost.