Modern Subst.i.tutes for Christianity.
by Pearson McAdam Muir.
I
POPULAR IMPEACHMENTS OF CHRISTIANITY
That there is at present a widespread alienation from the Christian Faith can hardly be denied. Sometimes by violent invective, sometimes by quiet a.s.sumption, the conclusion is conveyed that Christianity is obsolete. Whatever benefits it may have conferred in rude, unenlightened ages, it is now outgrown, it is not in keeping with the science and discovery of modern times. "The good Lord Jesus has had His day,"[1] is murmured in pitying condescension towards those who still suffer themselves to be deceived by the antiquated superst.i.tion.
The statements in which our forefathers embodied the relations {4} between G.o.d and man are no longer, except by a very few, considered adequate; and there is everywhere a demand that those statements should be recast. Is not all this an irresistible proof that the beliefs of the Church have been abandoned, that the old notions of the Divine care, the spiritual world, the everlasting life, cannot be maintained, must be relegated to the realm of imagination? The blessings with which Christianity is commonly credited spring from other sources: the evils with which society is infected are its result, direct or indirect.
I
Such accusations, it may occur to us, cannot be made seriously: they bear their refutation in the very making; they cannot be propounded with any expectation of being accepted. This may seem self-evident to us: it is not self-evident to mult.i.tudes of eager, {5} earnest men.
The accusations are persistently made by vigorous writers and impa.s.sioned speakers, and are received as incontrovertible propositions. However astonishing, however painful, it may be for us to hear, it is well that we should know, what, in largely circulated books and periodicals, and in ma.s.s meetings of the people, is said about the Faith which we profess, and about us who profess it.
Listen to some of the terms in which Christianity is impeached.
"I undertake," says Mr. Winwood Reade, "I undertake to show that the destruction of Christianity is essential to the interests of civilisation; and also that man will never attain his full powers as a moral being, until he has ceased to believe in a personal G.o.d, and in the immortality of the soul. Christianity must be destroyed."[2]
"The hostile evidence," says Mr. Philip {6} Vivian, "appears to be overwhelming. Christianity cannot be true. Provided that we see things as they really are, and not as we wish them to be, we cannot but come to this conclusion. We cannot get away from facts. Modern knowledge forces us to admit that the Christian Faith cannot be true."[3]
"I want," exclaims Mr. Vivian Carey, who has apparently, like Lord Herbert of Cherbury, received a revelation to prove that no revelation has been given, "I want to destroy the fetich of centuries and to instil in its place a life of duty, and of faith in G.o.d and man, and I believe there is a power that has impelled me to attempt this task....
A system that has produced such results must be essentially bad.... It will not be difficult to create a faith and a religion that will serve the needs of humanity, where Christianity has so deplorably failed."[4]
{7}
"If Christianity," argues Mr. Charles Watts, "were potent for good, that good would have been displayed ere now.... The ties of domestic affection, the bonds of the social compact, the political relations of rulers and ruled, all have surrendered themselves to its influence.
Yet with all these advantages, it has proved unable to keep pace with a progressive civilisation."[5]
"In a really humane and civilised nation," Mr. Robert Blatchford contends, "there should be and need be no such thing as Ignorance, Crime, Idleness, War, Slavery, Hate, Envy, Pride, Greed, Gluttony, Vice. But this is not a humane and civilised nation, and never will be while it accepts Christianity as its religion. These are my reasons for opposing Christianity."[6] "Christianity," he iterates and reiterates, "is not true."[7]
"Onward, ye children of the new Faith!" {8} exultantly cries Mr.
Moncure D. Conway. "The sun of Christendom hastes to its setting, but the hope never sets of those who know that the sunset here is a sunrise there!"[8]
Such is the manner in which the downfall of Christianity is now proclaimed. And the impression is prevalent that, though in all ages Christianity has been the object of doubt and of scorn, yet never has it been rejected with such intensity of hatred as now, never have keen criticism and deep earnestness, wide learning and shrewd mother-wit been so combined in the attack. It is not merely the reckless, the dissolute, the frivolous who turn away from its reproofs, seeking excuses for their self-indulgence, but it is the thoughtful, the austere, the high-principled, the reverent, the unselfish, who are engaged in a crusade against all that we, as Christians, hold dear.
"To the old spirit of mockery, coa.r.s.e or refined, to the old wrangle of argument, {9} also coa.r.s.e or refined, has succeeded the spirit of grave, measured, determined negation."[9] Men whose integrity and elevation of character are beyond suspicion, take their places among the rebels against the authority of Christ. They are fighting, they a.s.sert, not for the removal of a check to their vices, but for the introduction of a n.o.bler ideal. In the demolition of Christianity, in the sweeping away of every vestige of religious belief, religious custom, religious hope, they imagine themselves to be conferring inestimable benefits upon mankind. Christianity, in their view, is the product of delusion and the b.u.t.tress of all social ills.
II
The contrast which so many are drawing between the present and the past is not a little exaggerated. There have been few periods in which Christianity has not been the {10} object of animadversion and attack, in which its speedy downfall has not been confidently predicted. It was two hundred years ago that Dean Swift wrote _An Argument to prove that the Abolishing of Christianity in England may, as things now stand, be attended with some Inconveniences, and perhaps not produce those many good effects proposed thereby_": the Dean, with scathing sarcasm, ridiculing at once the conventional customs by which Christianity was misrepresented, and the supercilious ignorance which a.s.sumed that it was extinct.[10] It was about a quarter of a century later that Bishop Butler, in the advertis.e.m.e.nt to his _a.n.a.logy of Religion to the Const.i.tution and Course of Nature_, stated, "It is come, I know not how, to be taken for granted by many persons that Christianity is not so much as a subject of inquiry, but that it is now, at length, discovered to be fict.i.tious. And accordingly they treat it as if, {11} in the present age, this were an agreed point among all people of discernment; and nothing remained but to set it up as a princ.i.p.al subject of mirth and ridicule, as it were, by way of reprisals for its having so long interrupted the pleasures of the world." And the Bishop drily gave as the aim of the _a.n.a.logy_: "Thus much, at least, will be here found, not taken for granted but proved, that any reasonable man who will thoroughly consider the matter, may be as much a.s.sured as he is of his own being, that it is not, however, so clear a case that there is nothing in it."
The a.s.sumption that Christianity is a thing of the past can hardly be more prevalent now than it was then; and the groundlessness of the a.s.sumption then may lead to the conclusion that the a.s.sumption is equally groundless now. Since the days of Butler or of Swift, the progress of Christianity has not ceased: its developments of thought and {12} life have been among the most remarkable in its whole career.
The exultation over its decay in the twentieth century may possibly be found as premature and as vain as the exultation over its decay in the eighteenth century, or in any of the centuries which have gone before.
III
The most popular impeachments of Christianity are mainly these.
It is a ma.s.s of false and superst.i.tious beliefs long exploded. It is the opponent of progress and inquiry, the discoveries of science having been made in direct defiance of its teaching and its influence.
It is the champion of oppression and tyranny. It aims at keeping the poor in ignorance and dest.i.tution. It prostrates itself before the rich and seeks the patronage of the great.
It so insists on people being absorbed in {13} the thought of heaven that it practically precludes them from doing any good on earth.
It is a system of selfishness, inculcating the dogma that no one need care for anything except the salvation of his own soul.[11]
It is the foster-mother of all the evil and misery by which society is distressed. Dishonesty, cruelty, slavery, war, persecution, avarice, drunkenness, vice, would seem to be its natural fruits.
"How calm and sweet the victories of life,"
shrieked Sh.e.l.ley in one of his early poems.
"How terrorless the triumph of the grave ...
... but for thy aid Religion! but for thee, prolific fiend, Who peoplest earth with demons, h.e.l.l with men, And heaven with slaves!
Thou taintest all thou look"st upon!"[12]
What shall we say to these accusations? Christians have been credulous and superst.i.tious, have argued and acted as if only in {14} the abnormal and exceptional could the Divine Presence be found, as if G.o.d were a hard Taskmaster and capricious Tyrant. They have resisted progress and inquiry, blindly refusing to see the light which was streaming upon them. They have unquestionably been guilty of miserable pride towards inferiors in wealth or in station, and guilty of miserable sycophancy towards the rich and the powerful. Christians have too frequently neglected the material well-being of the community, have suffered disgraceful outward conditions to remain without protest, have not striven to shed abroad happiness and brightness in squalid and wretched lives. Christians have been art and part in fostering such conditions as wrung from compa.s.sionate and indignant hearts the _Song of the Shirt_ and the _Cry of the Children_. Christians have imagined that correctness of belief would make up for falseness of heart, and loudness of profession for depravity of {15} practice. Christians have supposed that in religion all that has to be striven for is the salvation of one"s own soul, have even represented the joy of the redeemed as heightened by a contemplation of the torments of the lost.
Christians must bear the responsibility of much of the abounding vice which they have not earnestly tried to combat where it already exists, and which, in various forms, they have introduced into regions where it was unknown before. Lawlessness and degradation in the slums, fraud and dishonesty in trade, gross revelations in the fashionable world; bigotry, slander, scandals in the ecclesiastical world; plots, wars, treacheries, a.s.sa.s.sinations, in the political world: these things ought not so to be. The fiercest denunciations, the most withering satires, which unbelievers have employed, do not exceed in intensity of condemnation the judgment which Christian preachers and Christian writers have p.r.o.nounced.[13]
{16}
In all ages of the Church the most powerful weapon against Christianity has been the example of Christians. The Faith which they nominally hold has been judged by the lives which they actually lead.[14]
"Christianity," said a bishop of the eighteenth century, "would perhaps be the last religion a wise man would choose, if he were guided by the lives of those who profess it."[15] But is this to admit that the hope of the world lies in renouncing Christianity? that in confining ourselves to the seen and the temporal, we shall best elevate mankind?
that the prospect of annihilation and the absence of wisdom, love, and Providence in the order of the universe const.i.tute the most glorious gospel which can be proclaimed? Nothing of the kind. It is only proved that many Christians are not acting according to their belief, that their practice does not square with their {17} profession. The belief and the profession are not proved to be wrong and bad. It would be unreasonable to argue that, because a man who has been vehemently sounding the praises of truthfulness is convicted of deliberate lying, therefore truthfulness is shown to be worthless. It is equally unreasonable to identify Christianity with everything to which it is most definitely opposed, to represent it as the enemy of everything which it was intended to maintain, and then to conclude that Christianity is discredited.[16] As we should argue from the detection of a liar, not that lying is right, but that he should return to the ways of truth, so we should argue from the lives of Christians who live in flagrant contradiction to the precepts of our Lord and His Apostles, not that the precepts should be rejected, but that they should be kept; not that Christianity should be abolished, but that it should be obeyed.
{18}
Christians have created prejudice, hatred, against Christianity, but it is not Christianity which they have been exhibiting. We repudiate the hideous travesty which they have made, the hideous travesty which is credulously or maliciously accepted by a.s.sailants as a correct representation. Christianity is not a religion of darkness and superst.i.tion: it calls to its disciples "Be children of light: prove all things: hold fast that which is good." Christianity does not sycophantishly court the rich and despise the poor: it tells the stories of the Rich Man and Lazarus, and of the Rich Fool, and it declares "Ye cannot serve G.o.d and Mammon." Christianity does not teach that the life which a man leads is of less consequence than the belief which he professes: it demands, "Why call ye Me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?" Christianity is not selfish, is not a system which inculcates the saving of one"s own soul as the first and last of duties: {19} "He that loveth his life shall lose it. Bear ye one another"s burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ. By this shall all men know that ye are My disciples if ye have love one to another." It is surely reasonable to demand that Christianity shall be judged, not by its misrepresentations, but by what it is in itself, not as it has been perverted by bitter enemies, or by false disciples, but as it is proclaimed and manifested in its Author and Finisher.
IV
In the face of such tremendous indictments, what is the duty inc.u.mbent on us who profess and call ourselves Christians? Certainly not that we should abjure the name, but that we should remember what the name signifies. We ought to consider our ways, to give ourselves to self-examination. There must be something amiss when such hideous portraits can be painted with any expectation of their being taken as correct likenesses. It is right {20} that we should repel with indignation the ludicrous and intolerable caricatures which are presented as our belief, the unwarrantable consequences which are deduced from it. It is right that we should remove misapprehensions and refute calumnies; but, above all it is necessary that we should take heed to our own conduct and our own character. The scandals which we have so much reason to deplore owe their existence, not to Christianity, but to the absence of Christianity. And the very sneers which greet any departure from rect.i.tude or morality on the part of a professing Christian prove that such a departure is not a manifestation, but a renunciation of Christianity, that what is expected of Christians is the highest and the best that human nature can produce.
"If," argues Mr. Blatchford, "if to praise Christ in words and deny Him in deeds be Christianity, then London is a Christian city and England is a Christian nation. For it is {21} very evident that our common English ideals are anti-Christian, and that our commercial, foreign, and social affairs are run on anti-Christian lines."[17] As Mr.
Blatchford"s life is spent in deploring the baseness of "our common English ideals," and in exposing the iniquity of the methods in which "our commercial, foreign, and social affairs" are conducted, the logical inference would seem to be that, as anti-Christian ideals and anti-Christian lines have so signally failed, it might be well to give Christian ideals and Christian lines a trial. "In a really humane and civilised nation," Mr. Blatchford maintains, "there should be, and there need be, no such thing as Poverty, Ignorance, Crime, Idleness, War, Slavery, Hate, Envy, Pride, Greed, Gluttony, Vice. But," he continues his curious argument, "this is not a humane and civilised nation, and never will be while it accepts Christianity as its religion. These," {22} so he adds as an irresistible conclusion, "these are my reasons for opposing Christianity."[18] Very good reasons, if Christianity taught such a creed and encouraged such a morality. But that any human being should give such a description of the purpose of Christian Faith indicates either that the describer is swayed by blindest prejudice or else that no genuine Christian has ever crossed his path.
"What if some do not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of G.o.d of none effect? G.o.d forbid: yea, let G.o.d be true, but every man a liar." Truth continues to be truth, though people who talk much about it may be false. Goodness continues to be goodness, though people who sing its praises may be thoroughly depraved. Generosity does not cease to be generosity, though its beauty should be extolled by a miser.
Courage does not cease to be courage, though its heroism should be extolled by a coward. Temperance {23} is temperance, though we should be a.s.sured of the fact by the thick speech of a drunkard. The virtue is admirable, even when those who acknowledge how admirable it is do not practise it.
That Christianity towers so far above the attainments of its average disciples, nay, above the attainments of its saintliest, is itself a kind of evidence of its divine origin. "When the King of the Tartars, who was become Christian," says Montaigne, "designed to come to Lyons to kiss the Pope"s feet, and there to be an eyewitness of the sanct.i.ty he hoped to find in our manners, immediately our good S. Louis sought to divert him from his purpose: for fear lest our inordinate way of living should, on the contrary, put him out of conceit with so holy a belief. And yet it happened quite otherwise to this other, who going to Rome to the same end, and there seeing the dissolution of the Prelates and people of that time, settled {24} himself so much the more firmly in our religion, considering how great the force and dignity of it must necessarily be that could maintain its dignity and splendour amongst so much corruption and in so vicious hands." G.o.d"s truth abides whether men receive it or deny it. Christ is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, though every so-called Christian should become apostate. The woes of the world are to be cured by more Christianity, not by less; and on us, in whose hands have been placed its holy oracles, rests the responsibility of proving its inestimable advantage ourselves and of conferring it on all mankind.
Wherever Christianity has really flourished, untold blessings have been the result.[19] With all the sad deficiencies and sadder perversions by which its course has been chequered, no influence for good can be compared with it in elevating character, in diffusing peace and {25} goodwill, in fitting men to labour and to endure. The diffusion of the spirit of Christianity is a synonym for the diffusion of all that tends to the true well-being of the world. Only as genuine Christianity, the Christianity of Christ, prevails, will mankind be morally and spiritually lifted into a higher sphere. Put together the wisest and most enn.o.bling suggestions of those who regard Christianity as obsolete and you find that it is virtually Christianity which is delineated. It is in the prevalence of principles and practices which, however they may be designated, are in reality Christian, that the salvation of society and of individuals will be found. In the absence of such principles and practices will be found the secret of ruin, disorder, dissolution, and decay.