Pickle the Spy.
by Andrew Lang.
PREFACE
This woful History began in my study of the Pelham Papers in the Additional Ma.n.u.scripts of the British Museum. These include the letters of Pickle the Spy and of JAMES MOHR MACGREGOR. Transcripts of them were sent by me to Mr. ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON, for use in a novel, which he did not live to finish. The character of Pickle, indeed, like that of the Master of Ballantrae, is alluring to writers of historical romance. Resisting the temptation to use Pickle as the villain of fiction, I have tried to tell his story with fidelity.
The secret, so long kept, of Prince Charles"s incognito, is divulged no less by his own correspondence in the Stuart MSS. than by the letters of Pickle.
For Her Majesty"s gracious permission to read the Stuart Papers in the library of Windsor Castle, and to engrave a miniature of Prince Charles in the Royal collection, I have respectfully to express my sincerest grat.i.tude.
To Mr. HOLMES, Her Majesty"s librarian, I owe much kind and valuable aid.
The Pickle Papers, and many despatches in the State Papers, were examined and copied for me by Miss E. A. IBBS.
In studying the Stuart Papers, I owe much to the aid of Miss VIOLET SIMPSON, who has also a.s.sisted me by verifying references from many sources.
It would not be easy to mention the numerous correspondents who have helped me, but it were ungrateful to omit acknowledgment of the kindness of Mr. HORATIO F. BROWN and of Mr. GEORGE T. OMOND.
I have to thank Mr. ALEXANDER PELHAM TROTTER for permission to cite the MS. Letter Book of the exiled Chevalier"s secretary, ANDREW LUMISDEN, in Mr. TROTTER"S possession.
Miss MACPHERSON of Cluny kindly gave me a copy of a privately printed Memorial of her celebrated ancestor, and, by CLUNY"S kind permission, I have been allowed to see some letters from his charter chest.
Apparently, the more important secret papers have perished in the years of turmoil and exile.
This opportunity may be taken for disclaiming any belief in the imputations against CLUNY conjecturally hazarded by "NEWTON," or KENNEDY, in the following pages. The Chief"s dest.i.tution in France, after a long period of suffering in Scotland, refutes these suspicions, bred in an atmosphere of jealousy and distrust. Among the relics of the family are none of the objects which CHARLES, in 1766-1767, found it difficult to obtain from CLUNY"S representatives for lack of a proper messenger.
To Sir ARTHUR HALKETT, Bart., of Pitfirrane, I am obliged for a view of BALHALDIE"S correspondence with his agent in Scotland.
The Directors of the French Foreign Office Archives courteously permitted Monsieur LEON PAJOT to examine, and copy for me, some of the doc.u.ments in their charge. These, it will be seen, add but little to our information during the years 1749-1766.
I have remarked, in the proper place, that Mr. MURRAY ROSE has already printed some of Pickle"s letters in a newspaper. As Mr.
MURRAY ROSE a.s.signed them to JAMES MOHR MACGREGOR, I await with interest his arguments in favour of this opinion in his promised volume of Essays.
The ornament on the cover of this work is a copy of that with which the volumes of Prince CHARLES"S own library were impressed. I owe the stamp to the kindness of Miss WARRENDER of Bruntsfield.
Among printed books, the most serviceable have been Mr. EWALD"S work on Prince Charles, Lord STANHOPE"S History, and Dr. BROWNE"S "History of the Highlands and Clans." Had Mr. EWALD explored the Stuart Papers and the Memoirs of d"Argenson, Grimm, de Luynes, Barbier, and the Letters of Madame du Deffand (edited by M. DE LESCURE), with the "Political Correspondence of Frederick the Great," little would have been left for gleaners in his track.
I must not forget to thank Mr. and Mrs. BARTELS for researches in old magazines and journals. Mr. BARTELS also examined for me the printed correspondence of Frederick the Great. To the kindness of J. A.
ERSKINE CUNNINGHAM, Esq., of Balgownie I owe permission to photograph the portrait of Young Glengarry in his possession.
If I might make a suggestion to historical students of leisure, it is this. The Life of the Old Chevalier (James III.) has never been written, and is well worth writing. My own studies, alas! prove that Prince Charles"s character was incapable of enduring misfortune. His father, less brilliant and less popular, was a very different man, and, I think, has everything to gain from an unprejudiced examination of his career. He has certainly nothing to lose.
Since this work was in type the whole of Bishop Forbes"s MS., The Lyon in Mourning, has been printed for an Historical Society in Scotland. I was unable to consult the MS. for this book, but it contains, I now find, no addition to the facts here set forth.
November 5, 1896.
CHAPTER I--INTRODUCTORY TO PICKLE
Subject of this book--The last rally of Jacobitism hitherto obscure-- Nature of the new materials--Information from spies, unpublished Stuart Papers, &c.--The chief spy--Probably known to Sir Walter Scott--"Redgauntlet" cited--"Pickle the Spy"--His position and services--The hidden gold of Loch Arkaig--Consequent treacheries-- Character of Pickle--Pickle"s nephew--Pickle"s portrait--Pickle detected and denounced--To no purpose--Historical summary--Incognito of Prince Charles--Plan of this work.
The latest rally of Jacobitism, with its last romance, so faded and so tarnished, has. .h.i.therto remained obscure. The facts on which "Waverley" is based are familiar to all the world: those on which "Redgauntlet" rests were but imperfectly known even to Sir Walter Scott. The story of the Forty-five is the tale of Highland loyalty: the story of 1750-1763 is the record of Highland treachery, or rather of the treachery of some Highlanders. That story, now for the first time to be told, is founded on doc.u.ments never hither to published, or never previously pieced together. The Additional Ma.n.u.scripts of the British Museum, with relics of the government of Henry Pelham and his brother, the Duke of Newcastle, have yielded their secrets, and given the information of the spies. The Stuart Papers at Windsor (partly published in Browne"s "History of the Highland Clans" and by Lord Stanhope, but mainly virginal of type) fill up the interstices in the Pelham Papers like pieces in a mosaic, and reveal the general design. The letters of British amba.s.sadors at Paris, Dresden, Berlin, Hanover, Leipzig, Florence, St. Petersburg, lend colour and coherence. The political correspondence of Frederick the Great contributes to the effect. A trifle of information comes from the French Foreign Office Archives; French printed "Memoires" and letters, neglected by previous English writers on the subject, offer some valuable, indeed essential, hints, and ill.u.s.trate Charles"s relations with the wits and beauties of the reign of Louis XV. By combining information from these and other sources in print, ma.n.u.script, and tradition, we reach various results. We can now follow and understand the changes in the singular and wretched development of the character of Prince Charles Edward Stuart. We get a curious view of the manners, and a lurid light on the diplomacy of the middle of the eighteenth century. We go behind the scenes of many conspiracies. Above all, we encounter an extraordinary personage, the great, highborn Highland chief who sold himself as a spy to the English Government.
His existence was suspected by Scott, if not clearly known and understood.
In his introduction to "Redgauntlet," {3} Sir Walter Scott says that the ministers of George III. "thought it proper to leave Dr.
Cameron"s new schemes in concealment (1753), lest by divulging them they had indicated the channel of communication which, it is now well known, they possessed to all the plots of Charles Edward." To "indicate" that secret "channel of communication" between the Government of the Pelhams and the Jacobite conspirators of 1749-1760 is one purpose of this book. Tradition has vaguely bequeathed to us the name of "Pickle the Spy," the foremost of many traitors. Who Pickle was, and what he did, a whole romance of prosperous treachery, is now to be revealed and ill.u.s.trated from various sources. Pickle was not only able to keep the Duke of Newcastle and George II. well informed as to the inmost plots, if not the most hidden movements of Prince Charles, but he could either paralyse a serious, or promote a premature, rising in the Highlands, as seemed best to his English employers. We shall find Pickle, in company with that devoted Jacobite, Lochgarry, travelling through the Highlands, exciting hopes, consulting the chiefs, unburying a hidden treasure, and encouraging the clans to rush once more on English bayonets.
Romance, in a way, is stereotyped, and it is characteristic that the last romance of the Stuarts should be interwoven with a secret treasure. This ma.s.s of French gold, buried after Culloden at Loch Arkaig, in one of the most remote recesses of the Highlands, was, to the Jacobites, what the dwarf Andvari"s h.o.a.rd was to the Niflungs, a curse and a cause of discord. We shall see that rivalry for its possession produced contending charges of disloyalty, forgery, and theft among certain of the Highland chiefs, and these may have helped to promote the spirit of treachery in Pickle the Spy. It is probable, though not certain, that he had acted as the agent of c.u.mberland before he was sold to Henry Pelham, and he was certainly communicating the results of his inquiries in one sense to George II., and, in another sense, to the exiled James III. in Rome. He was betraying his own cousins, and traducing his friends. Pickle is plainly no common spy or "paltry vidette," as he words it. Possibly Sir Walter Scott knew who Pickle was: in him Scott, if he had chosen, would have found a character very like Barry Lyndon (but worse), very unlike any personage in the Waverley Novels, and somewhat akin to the Master of Ballantrae. The cool, good-humoured, smiling, unscrupulous villain of high rank and n.o.ble lineage; the scoundrel happily unconscious of his own unspeakable infamy, proud and sensitive upon the point of honour; the picturesque hypocrite in religion, is a being whom we do not meet in Sir Walter"s romances.
In Pickle he had such a character ready made to his hand, but, in the time of Scott, it would have been dangerous, as it is still disagreeable, to unveil this old mystery of iniquity. A friend of Sir Walter"s, a man very ready with the pistol, the last, as was commonly said, of the Highland chiefs, was of the name and blood of Pickle, and would have taken up Pickle"s feud. Sir Walter was not to be moved by pistols, but not even for the sake of a good story would he hurt the sensibilities of a friend, or tarnish the justly celebrated loyalty of the Highlands.
Now the friend of Scott, the representative of Pickle in Scott"s generation, was a Highlander, and Pickle was not only a traitor, a profligate, an oppressor of his tenantry, and a liar, but (according to Jacobite gossip which reached "King James") a forger of the King"s name! Moreover he was, in all probability, one fountain of that reproach, true or false, which still clings to the name of the brave and gentle Archibald Cameron, the brother of Lochiel, whom Pickle brought to the gallows. If we add that, when last we hear of Pickle, he is probably engaged in a double treason, and certainly meditates selling a regiment of his clan, like Hessians, to the Hanoverian Government, it will be plain that his was no story for Scott to tell.
Pickle had, at least, the attraction of being eminently handsome. No statelier gentleman than Pickle, as his faded portrait shows him in full Highland costume, ever trod a measure at Holyrood. Tall, athletic, with a frank and pleasing face, Pickle could never be taken for a traitor and a spy. He seemed the fitting lord of that castellated palace of his race, which, beautiful and majestic in decay, mirrors itself in Loch Oich. Again, the man was brave; for he moved freely in France, England, and Scotland, well knowing that the skian was sharpened for his throat if he were detected. And the most extraordinary fact in an extraordinary story is that Pickle WAS detected, and denounced to the King over the water by Mrs. Archibald Cameron, the widow of his victim. Yet the breach between James and his little Court, on one side, and Prince Charles on the other, was then so absolute that the Prince was dining with the spy, chatting with him at the opera-ball, and presenting him with a gold snuff-box, at about the very time when Pickle"s treachery was known in Rome.
Afterwards, the knowledge of his infamy came too late, if it came at all. The great scheme had failed; Cameron had fallen, and Frederick of Prussia, ceasing to encourage Jacobitism, had become the ally of England.
These things sound like the inventions of the romancer, but they rest on unimpeachable evidence, printed and ma.n.u.script, and chiefly on Pickle"s own letters to his King, to his Prince, and to his English employers--we cannot say "pay-masters," for PICKLE WAS NEVER PAID!
He obtained, indeed, singular advantages, but he seldom or never could wring ready money from the Duke of Newcastle.
To understand Pickle"s career, the reluctant reader must endure a certain amount of actual history in minute details of date and place.
Every one is acquainted with the brilliant hour of Prince Charles: his landing in Moidart accompanied by only seven men, his march on Edinburgh, his success at Prestonpans, the race to Derby, the retreat to Scotland, the gleam of victory at Falkirk, the ruin of Culloden, the long months of wanderings and distress, the return to France in 1746. Then came two years of baffled intrigues; next, the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle insisted on the Prince"s expulsion from France; last, he declined to withdraw. On December 10, 1748, he was arrested at the opera, was lodged in the prison of Vincennes, was released, and made his way to the Pope"s city of Avignon, arriving there in the last days of December 1748. On February 28, 1749, he rode out of Avignon, and disappeared for many months from the ken of history.
For nearly eighteen years he preserved his incognito, vaguely heard of here and there in England, France, Germany, Flanders, but always involved in mystery. On that mystery, impenetrable to his father, Pickle threw light enough for the purposes of the English Government, but not during the darkest hours of Charles"s incognito.
"Le Prince Edouard," says Barbier in his journal for February 1750, "fait l"admiration et la curiosite de l"Europe." This work, alas! is not likely to add to the admiration entertained for the unfortunate adventurer, but any surviving curiosity as to the Prince"s secret may be a.s.suaged. In the days of 1749-1750, before Pickle"s revelations begin, the drafts of the Prince"s memoranda, notes, and angry love- letters, preserved in Her Majesty"s Library, enable us to follow his movements. On much that is obscurely indicated in scarcely decipherable scrawls, light is thrown by the French memoirs of that age. The names of Madame de Talmond, Madame d"Aiguillon, and the celebrated Montesquieu, are beacons in the general twilight. The memoirs also explain, what was previously inexplicable, the motives of Charles in choosing a life "in a hole of a rock," as he said after the Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle (1748). It is necessary, however, to study the internal feuds of the Jacobites at this period, and these are illuminated by the Stuart Papers, the letters of James and his ministers.
The plan of our narrative, therefore, will be arranged in the following manner. First, we sketch the character of Prince Charles in boyhood, during his Scottish expedition, and as it developed in cruelly thwarting circ.u.mstances between 1746 and 1749. In ill.u.s.trating his character the hostile parties within the Jacobite camp must be described and defined. From February 1749 to September 1750 (when he visited London), we must try to pierce the darkness that has been more than Egyptian. We can, at least, display the total ignorance of Courts and diplomatists as to Charles"s movements before Pickle came to their a.s.sistance, and we discover a secret which they ought to have known.
After the date 1752 we give, as far as possible, the personal history of Pickle before he sold himself, and we unveil his motives for his villany. Then we display Pickle in action, we select from his letters, we show him deep in the Scottish, English, and continental intrigues. He spoils the Elibank Plot, he reveals the hostile policy of Frederick the Great, he leads on to the arrest of Archibald Cameron, he sows disunion, he traduces and betrays. He finally recovers his lands, robs his tenants, dabbles (probably) in the French scheme of invasion (1759), offers further information, tries to sell a regiment of his clan, and dies unexposed in 1761.
Minor spies are tracked here and there, as Rob Roy"s son, James Mohr Macgregor, Samuel Cameron, and Oliver Macallester. English machinations against the Prince"s life and liberty are unveiled. His utter decadence is ill.u.s.trated, and we leave him weary, dishonoured, and abandoned.
"A sair, sair altered man Prince Charlie cam" hame"
to Rome; and the refusal there of even a t.i.tular kingship.
The whole book aims chiefly at satisfying the pa.s.sion of curiosity.
However unimportant a secret may be, it is pleasant to know what all Europe was once vainly anxious to discover. In the revelation of manners, too, and in tracing the relations of famous wits and beauties with a person then so celebrated as Prince Charles, there is a certain amount of entertainment which may excuse some labour of research. Our history is of next to no political value, but it revives as in a magic mirror somewhat dim, certain scenes of actual human life. Now and again the mist breaks, and real pa.s.sionate faces, gestures of living men and women, are beheld in the clear- obscure. We see Lochgarry throw his dirk after his son, and p.r.o.nounce his curse. We mark Pickle furtively scribbling after midnight in French inns. We note Charles hiding in the alcove of a lady"s chamber in a convent. We admire the "rich anger" of his Polish mistress, and the sullen rage of Lord Hyndford, baffled by "the perfidious Court" of Frederick the Great. The old histories emerge into light, like the writing in sympathetic ink on the secret despatches of King James.
CHAPTER II--CHARLES EDWARD STUART
Prince Charles--Contradictions in his character--Extremes of bad and good--Evolution of character--The Prince"s personal advantages-- Common mistake as to the colour of his eyes--His portraits from youth to age--Descriptions of Charles by the Duc de Liria; the President de Brosses; Gray; Charles"s courage--The siege of Gaeta--Story of Lord Elcho--The real facts--The Prince"s horse shot at Culloden--Foolish fables of David Hume confuted--Charles"s literary tastes--His clemency--His honourable conduct--Contrast with c.u.mberland--His graciousness--His faults--Charge of avarice--Love of wine--Religious levity--James on Charles"s faults--An unpleasant discovery--Influence of Murray of Broughton--Rapid decline of character after 1746-- Temper, wine, and women--Deep distrust of James"s Court--Rupture with James--Divisions among Jacobites--King"s men and Prince"s men-- Marischal, Kelly, Lismore, Clancarty--Anecdote of Clancarty and Braddock--Clancarty and d"Argenson--Balhaldie--Lally Tollendal--The Duke of York--His secret flight from Paris--"Insigne Fourberie"-- Anxiety of Charles--The fatal cardinal"s hat--Madame de Pompadour-- Charles rejects her advances--His love affairs--Madame de Talmond-- Voltaire"s verses on her--Her scepticism in religion--Her husband-- Correspondence with Montesquieu--The d.u.c.h.esse d"Aiguillon--Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle--Charles refuses to retire to Fribourg--The gold plate--Scenes with Madame de Talmond--Bulkeley"s interference--Arrest of Charles--The compa.s.ses--Charles goes to Avignon--His desperate condition--His policy--Based on a scheme of d"Argenson--He leaves Avignon--He is lost to sight and hearing.