The Real Gladstone.
by J. Ewing Ritchie.
PREFACE.
In this little work I have aimed to write, not a history or a biography, not a criticism or a eulogy, but merely to give a few scattered notes, gathered from many quarters, for the general public, rather than for the professional politician. Lord Rosebery is reported to have said that it will require many writers to give a complete biography of Mr. Gladstone.
He may be right; but the evil of it will be, the work, if exhaustive, will be exhausting. Especially will it be so in these busy times, when yesterday"s biographies become stale to a public forgetful of the past, caring only for the present, oblivious of the morrow. It is almost an impertinence to speak of the many claims Mr. Gladstone has on a people whom he has served so long. All I claim to do is to give a few data which may help them to estimate the
"Heroic mind Expressed in action, in endurance proved"-
in short, more or less imperfectly, "The Real Gladstone."
Clacton, _May_, 1898.
CHAPTER I.
BIRTH AND SCHOOLDAYS.
Many, many years ago England"s foremost statesman, as George Canning then was, distrusted by the mult.i.tude, feared by his colleagues, regarded with suspicion by the First Gentleman of the Age-as it was the fashion to term George the Magnificent, who was then seated on the British throne-wearied of the strife and turmoil of party, spent a short time at Seaforth House, bidding what he deemed his farewell to his Liverpool correspondents. His custom, we are told, was to sit for hours gazing on the wide expanse of waters before him. His had been a marvellous career. Born out of the circle of the ruling cla.s.ses, by his indomitable energy, the greatness of his intellectual gifts, his brilliant eloquence, he had lifted himself up above his contemporaries, and had become their leader; and here he was about to quit the scene of his triumphs-to reign as Viceroy in a far-off land. Canning, however, did not retire from the Parliamentary arena, but stopped at home to be Premier of Great Britain and Ireland, and to let all Europe know that this country had done with the Holy Alliance; that a new and better spirit was walking the earth; that the dark night of bigotry was past, and that the dawn of a better day had come. As he sat there looking out over the waters, a little one was to be seen playing below upon the sand. That little lad was the son of Canning"s host and friend, and his name was William Ewart Gladstone. Does it not seem as if the little one playing on the sand had unconsciously caught something of the genius, of the individuality, of the eloquence, of the loftiness of aim, of the statesman who sat above him overlooking the sea?
Circ.u.mstances have much to do with the formation of character. To the youthful Gladstone, Canning was a light, a glory, and a star.
William Ewart Gladstone was born on December 29, 1809, at a house which may still be seen, 62, Rodney Street, Liverpool. He was of Scotch extraction, his father, a Liverpool merchant, having an estate in Scotland. Mr. Gladstone senior lived to become one of the merchant princes of Great Britain, a Baronet, and a Member of Parliament. He died, at the advanced age of eighty-seven, in 1851. His wife was Anne, daughter of Andrew Robertson, of Stornoway. They had six children; William Ewart Gladstone was the third. The family were all brought up as debaters. The children and their parents are said to have argued upon everything. They would debate whether the meat should be boiled or broiled, whether a window should be shut or opened, and whether it was likely to be fine or wet next day.
As a little boy, Gladstone went to school at Seaforth, where the late Dean Stanley was a pupil. The latter is responsible for the following: "There is a small school near Liverpool at which Mr. Gladstone was brought up before he went to Eton. A few years ago, another little boy who was sent to this school, and whose name I will not mention, called upon the old clergyman who was the headmaster. The boy was now a young man, and he said to the old clergyman: "There is one thing in which I have never in the least degree improved since I was at school-the casting up of figures." "Well," replied the master, "it is very extraordinary that it should be so, because certainly no one could be a more incapable arithmetician at school than you were; but I will tell you a curious thing. When Mr. Gladstone was at the school, he was just as incapable at addition and subtraction as you were; now you see what he has become-he is one of the greatest of our financiers.""
William Gladstone left home for Eton after the summer holidays of 1821, the headmaster being Dr. Keate. Sir Roderick Murchison describes him as "the prettiest little boy that ever went to Eton." From the first he was a hard student and well behaved, and exercised a good influence over his schoolfellows. "I was a thoroughly idle boy," said the late Bishop Hamilton of Salisbury, "but I was saved from worse things by getting to know Gladstone." Another schoolfellow remembered how he turned his gla.s.s upside down, and refused to drink a coa.r.s.e toast proposed according to custom at an election dinner. His most intimate friend was Arthur Hallam, of whom he wrote an article in the _Daily Telegraph_, which created universal admiration. He had the courage of his opinions, and when bantered by some of his a.s.sociates for his interfering on behalf of some ill-used pigs, he offered to write his reply "in good round hand upon their faces." He took no delight in games, but kept a private boat for his own use, and was a great walker with his select friends. He was accustomed on holidays to go as far as Salt Hall, to bully the fat waiter, eat toasted cheese, and drink egg-wine-hence he seems to have been familiarly known as Mr. Tipple. But he soon became especially distinguished by his editing the _Eton Miscellany_, and for his skill in debate at what was commonly called the Pop. Its meetings were generally held over a cook-shop, and its politics were intensely Tory, though current politics were forbidden subjects. His maiden speech was in favour of education. Eton at that time was not a good school, writes Sir Francis Doyle; but he testifies strongly to the virtues of the debating society. He continues: "In the debating society Mr. Gladstone soon distinguished himself. I had the privilege of listening to his maiden speech. It began, I recollect, with these words: "Sir, in this age of increasing and still increasing civilization . . ." After Mr.
Gladstone"s arrival, the debating society doubled and trebled itself in point of numbers, and the discussions became much fuller of interest and animation. Hallam and Mr. Gladstone took the lead." Not content with the regular debating society, Mr. Gladstone and a few others, such as Miles Gaskell and Canning, established an inner one, held on certain summer afternoons in the garden of one Trotman. Sir Francis continues: "It happened that my tutor, Mr. Okes, rented a small garden at the rear of Trotman"s, and by some chance found himself there on the occasion of one of these debates. To his surprise, he heard three or four boys on the other side of the wall sneering, shouting, and boohooing in the most unaccountable manner. There seemed but one conclusion to him as an experienced Eton tutor-viz., that they were what we at the Custom-House used somewhat euphemistically to term under the influence of liquor. He thereupon summoned Mr. Gladstone to his study, listened gloomily and reluctantly to his explanations and excuses, and all but handed over our ill.u.s.trious Premier, with his subordinate orators, to be flogged for drunkenness."
Dr. Wilkinson, in his "Reminiscences of Eton," gives a couplet and its translation by Mr. Gladstone, when a boy at Eton:
"Ne sis O cera mollior, Grandiloquus et va.n.u.s; Heus bone non es gigas tu, Et non sum ego na.n.u.s."
"Don"t tip me now, you lad of wax, Your blarney and locution; You"re not a giant yet, I hope, Nor I a Liliputian."
As to the _Miscellany_, with which Mr. Gladstone had so much to do, Sir Francis continues: "It would have fallen to the ground but for Mr.
Gladstone"s energy, perseverance, and tact. I may as well remark here that my father-as I have said elsewhere, a man of great ability as well as of great experience in life-predicted Mr. Gladstone"s future eminence from the manner in which he handled this somewhat tiresome business. "It is not," he remarked, "that I think his papers better than yours or Hallam"s-that is not my meaning at all; but the force of character he has shown in managing his subordinates (insubordinates I should rather call them), and the combination of ability and power that he has made evident, convince me that such a young man cannot fail to distinguish himself hereafter."" Further, Sir Francis Doyle writes: "I cannot take leave of Mr. Gladstone"s Eton career without recording a joke of his which, even in this distance of time, seems calculated to thrill the heart of Midlothian with horror and dismay. He was then, I must remind my hearers, a high Tory, and, moreover, used to criticise my pa.s.sion for the turf. One day I was steadily computing the odds for the Derby, as they stood in a morning newspaper. Now, it happened that the Duke of Grafton owned a colt called Hampden, who figured in the aforesaid list. "Well,"
cried Mr. Gladstone, reading off the odds, "Hampden, at any rate, I see, is in his proper place between _Zeal_ and _Lunacy_!""
The impression Gladstone made on his schoolfellows at Eton is clearly shown in a letter of Miles Gaskell to his mother, pleading for his going to Oxford rather than Cambridge: "Gladstone is no ordinary individual.
. . . If you finally decide in favour of Cambridge, my separation from Gladstone will be a source of great sorrow to me." And Arthur Hallam wrote: "Whatever may be our lot, I am very confident that he is a bud that will blossom with a richer fragrance than almost any whose early promise I have witnessed."
Gladstone, as has already been shown, was one of the princ.i.p.al members of the staff of the _Eton Miscellany_. He was then seventeen, and in one of the articles signed by him he expressed his fear that he would not be able to direct public opinion into the right channel. He was aware that merit was always rewarded, but he asked himself if he possessed that merit. He dared not presume that he did possess it, though he felt within him a something which made him hope to be able, without much hindrance, to gain public favour, and, as Virgil said, "celerare viam rumore secundo." We find Gladstone the Etonian expressing similar hopes in an article on "Eloquence." The young author shows us himself and his school-colleagues fascinated by the resounding debates in the House of Commons, and dreaming, boy-like, of making a successful Parliamentary debut, perhaps being offered a Government berth-a Secretaryship of State, even the post of Prime Minister. While entertaining these ambitious views Mr. Gladstone calmed his mind by "taking to poetry." Several poetical pieces, including some verses on "Richard Cur-de-Lion," and an ode to "The Shade of Wat Tyler," date from this period.
As a pendant to this fragmentary sketch of Mr. Gladstone"s schooldays, we may quote the lively description of the young editor given by Sir Francis Doyle in "A Familiar Epistle to W. E. Gladstone, Esq., M.P.," published in 1841. Sir Francis paints a delightful picture of the _redacteur-en-chef_:
"Who, in his editorial den, Clenched grimly an eradicating pen, Confronting frantic poets with calm eye, And dooming hardened metaphors to die.
Who, if he found his young adherents fail, The ode unfinished, uncommenced the tale, With the next number bawling to be fed, And its false feeders lat.i.tant or fled, Sat down unflinchingly to write it all, And kept the staggering project from a fall."
Dr. Furnivall, president of the Maurice Rowing Club, lately sent Mr.
Gladstone a copy of his letter on "Sculls or Oars." The ex-Prime Minister, in returning his thanks for the letter, says: "When I was at Eton, and during the season, I sculled constantly, more than almost any other boy in the school. Our boats then were not so light as they now are, but they went along merrily, with no fear of getting them under water."
CHAPTER II.
GLADSTONE AT OXFORD.
After spending six months with private tutors, in October, 1828, he went up to Christ Church, Oxford, and the following year was nominated to a studentship. "As for Gladstone," writes Sir Francis Doyle, "in the earlier part of his undergraduateship he read steadily, and did not exert himself to shine as a speaker; in point of fact, he did not attempt to distinguish himself in the Debating Society till he had pretty well made sure of his distinction in the Schools. I used often to walk with him in the afternoon, but I never recollect riding or boating in his company, and I believe that he was seldom diverted from his normal const.i.tutional between two and five along one of the Oxford roads. The most adventurous thing I ever did at Oxford in Mr. Gladstone"s company, if it really were as adventurous as I find he still a.s.serts it to have been, was when I allowed myself to be taken to Dissenting chapels. We were rewarded by hearing Dr. Chalmers preach on two occasions, and Rowland Hill at another time."
Gladstone seems to have delighted in these escapades. His mother was an occasional attendant on the ministrations of the celebrated Dissenting preacher Dr. Raffles, of Liverpool, and possibly might have taken the future Premier with her. His attendance at church was very regular. "He used rather to mount guard over my religious observances," writes Sir Francis Doyle, "and habitually marched me off after luncheon to the University sermon at two o"clock. Now, I have not the gift of snoring comfortably under a dull preacher; instead of a narcotic he acts on my nerves as an irritant, but with Mr. Gladstone the case was different.
One afternoon I looked up, and discovered, not without a glow of triumph, that although the reverend gentleman above me had not yet arrived at his "Thirdly," my Mentor was sleeping the sleep of the just. "Hullo!" said I to myself, "no more two-o"clock sermons for me." Accordingly, on the very next occasion when he came to carry me off, my answer was ready: "No, thank you, not to-day. I can sleep just as well in my arm-chair as at St. Mary"s." The great man was discomfited, and retired, shaking his head, but he acknowledged his defeat by troubling me no more in that matter."
Cardinal Manning had been the princ.i.p.al leader in the Oxford Debating Society till Mr. Gladstone appeared upon the scene. At once he and Gaskell became the leading Christ Church orators, and the great oratorical event of the time was Mr. Gladstone"s speech against the first Reform Bill. "Most of the speakers," writes Sir Francis Doyle, who was present on the occasion, "rose more or less above their ordinary level, but when Mr. Gladstone sat down we all of us felt that an epoch in our lives had arrived. It was certainly the finest speech of his that I ever heard. The effect produced by that great speech led to his being returned to Parliament as M.P. for Newark by the Tory Duke of Newcastle, who is remembered for his question, "May I not do what I like with my own?""
To return to Mr. Gladstone"s career at the University. In 1831 he took a double first-cla.s.s, and would easily have attained a Fellowship in any college where Fellowships depended upon a compet.i.tive examination. He held with Scott, the foremost scholar of the day, the second place in the Ireland for 1829. In that year a deputation from the Union of Cambridge went to Oxford to take part in a debate on the respective merits of Byron and Sh.e.l.ley. One of the Cambridge party was Monckton Milnes, afterwards Lord Houghton. He writes: "The man that took me most was the youngest Gladstone, of Liverpool-I am sure a very superior person." On all he seems to have exercised a beneficial influence. He deprecated the example of the gentlemen commoners, and did much to check the pernicious habit prevalent at that time in the University, of over-indulgence in wine. His tutor was the Rev. Robert Briscoe. He also attended the lectures of the Rev. Dr. Benton on divinity and Dr. Pusey on Hebrew. He read cla.s.sics privately with a tutor of the Bishop of St. Andrews. In 1830 he was at Cuddesdon Vicarage with a small reading-party, where he seems to have mastered Hooker"s "Ecclesiastical Polity." He founded and presided over an essay society called after his name, of which he was successively secretary and president. In his maiden speech at the Union in 1830 he defended Catholic emanc.i.p.ation; declared the Duke of Wellington"s Government unworthy of the confidence of the nation; opposed the removal of Jewish disabilities; and argued for the gradual emanc.i.p.ation of slavery rather than immediate abolition.
It is evident that all the time of his University career Mr. Gladstone had a profoundly religious bias, and at one time seems to have contemplated taking Holy Orders. Bishop Wordsworth declared that no man of his standing read the Bible more or knew it better. One of his fellow-students writes: "Poor Gladstone mixed himself up with the St.
Mary Hall and Oriel set, who are really for the most part only fit to live with maiden aunts and keep tame rabbits." At this time Mr.
Gladstone"s High Churchmanship does not seem to have been so p.r.o.nounced as it afterwards became. He was a disciple of Canning, and rejoiced at Catholic emanc.i.p.ation. "When in Scotland, staying at his father"s house in Kincardineshire, he attended the Presbyterian Kirk zealously and contentedly, and took me with him," writes Sir Francis Doyle, "to what they call the "fencing of the tables," an operation lasting five or six hours."
One of Gladstone"s college acquaintances was Martin Tupper, whose "Proverbial Philosophy" had a sale out of all proportion to its merits, in 1864. He wrote-
"Orator, statesman, scholar, and sage, The Crichton-more, the Gladstone of his age."
"My first acquaintance with Gladstone," Martin Tupper writes, "was a memorable event. It was at that time not so common a thing for undergraduates to go to the Communion at Christ Church Cathedral, that holy celebration being supposed to be for the particular benefit of Deans and Canons and Masters of Arts; so when two undergraduates went out of the chancel together after Communion, which they had both attended, it is small wonder that they addressed each other genially, in defiance of Oxford etiquette, nor that a friendship so well begun has continued to this hour." He testifies how Gladstone was the foremost man-warm-hearted, earnest, hard working, and religious, and had a following even in his teens.
The following anecdote is amusing. Tupper writes: "I had the honour at Christ Church of being prize-taker of Dr. Benton"s theological essay, "The Reconciliation of Matthew and John," when Gladstone, who had also contested it, stood second, and when Dr. Benton had me before him to give me the twenty-five pounds" worth of books, he requested me to allow Mr.
Gladstone to have five pounds" worth, as he was so good a second." Alas!
Mr. Tupper in after-life was led to think that the man to whom at one time he looked up, had deviated from the proper path. In his "Three Hundred Sonnets," he kindly undertook, in the reference to Gladstone, to warn the public to
"Beware of mere delusive eloquence."
And again he wrote of a
"Glozing tongue whom none can trust."
Still, it is well to quote in this connection how Tupper considered Gladstone the central figure at Oxford University. He writes: "Fifty years ago Briscoe"s Aristotle cla.s.s at Christ Church was comprised almost wholly of men who have since become celebrated, some in a remarkable degree; and as we believe that so many names afterwards attaining to great distinction have rarely been a.s.sociated at one lecture board, either at Oxford or elsewhere, it may be allowed to one who counts himself the least and lowest of the company to pen this brief note of those old Aristotelians. In this cla.s.s was Gladstone, ever from youth up the beloved and admired of many personal intimates."
Miss Clough"s character of Gladstone, solely from his handwriting, is thus recorded by Lord Houghton: "A well-judging person; a good cla.s.sic; considerate; apt to mistrust himself; undecided; if to choose a profession, would prefer the Church; has much application; a good reasoner; very affectionate and tender in his domestic relations; has a good deal of pride and determination, or rather obstinacy; is very fond of society, particularly ladies"; is neat, and fond of reading."
Bishop Wordsworth writes: "My cousin William Wordsworth, then living at Eton, was dining at Liverpool at the house of a great Liverpool merchant just after Gladstone had taken his degree. Amongst the company were Wordsworth, the poet, and Mr. John Gladstone, the father of the future Premier. After dinner, the poet congratulated the father on the success of his distinguished son. "Yes, sir," replied the father, "I thank you.
My son has greatly distinguished himself at the University, and I trust he will continue to do so when he enters public life, for there is no doubt that he is a man of great ability, but he has no stability.""